I try to avoid the timeline as much as possible. But I'd like to point out the following: OoA and OoS happen simultainously, MM happens either before link goes to the future in OoT or after he defeats Ganon and goes back in time, atleast OoT (maybe MM) happens before WW, PH happans after that, then ST happens hundreds of years after that, and just to prove Nintendo has expressed timelines, they said that Twilight princess happens at the same time as The Wind Waker. There is no say rom nintendo about the FS Seris or any other Zelda game except that some game occured right before Zelda II. I do not support timelines (except the following that Nintendo said). Although, Nintendo said this is what happens, then they said there is no timelines, then they had an interview with Miyamoto on a Magazine that proved all this once again, so I'm a little iffy.
You're contradicting yourself by saying you don't support the timelines by going on to try to explain why there is a timeline.
Go ahead and send Nintendo an email about Zelda and timelines. You'll get a response back that states quite clearly
there is no timeline."The Legend of Zelda" is what happens before "Zelda II".
"The Ocarina of Time" is what happens before "Majora's Mask".
"The Wind Waker" is what happens before "The Phantom Hourglass" and subsequently "Spirit Tracks".
So on so forth. These games do not relate to one another. Zelda II and Ocarina of Time don't tie in. Link to the Past and The Wind Waker don't tie in.
None of them connect unless
otherwise directly specified in the game.You're trying to say you're not involving timelines, but you're using it to attempt to prove some theory that you're trying to make self fulfilling by ignoring counterpoints.
Each game is meant to be enjoyed
by itself with no relation to the other. It's something that you have to deal with.