^But you voted for Surface :PHad to...God made me do it.
Just sayin XD
Yeah, right. The pokemon game just jumped from zero to seventeen votes.I didn't know there was money involved in the PotM prizes, who witholds this information from all but one contestant :P?
I suspect a serious case of fraud here!
Yeah, right. The pokemon game just jumped from zero to seventeen votes.That or CeFurKan has asked a number of people playing his game to vote here anonymously. Maybe you should make the rule you can only vote anonymously when you have over 10 posts somewhere else in the boards.
I suspect a serious case of fraud here!
I vote:
Ode to Zelda GB: Real nice game and I hope that the revision becomes even better.
The Myth of Heroa: A real good homage to the NES Zelda. Just love it.
OOT2D Map Project: A project with a lot of potential to be actually used in a game one day.Yeah, right. The pokemon game just jumped from zero to seventeen votes.That or CeFurKan has asked a number of people playing his game to vote here anonymously. Maybe you should make the rule you can only vote anonymously when you have over 10 posts somewhere else in the boards.
I suspect a serious case of fraud here!
Theforeshadower: I'm unsure what'll happen if I remove one of the voting options somewhere in between so I'd like to just keep the topic in the poll. We could agree that it won't be moved to sponsored if voted for should you have objections.Yeah. Just keep it from being put in sponsored. Don't think it'll get a vote, but you never know :/
Okay; I'm going to mildly abuse my power and expose this;
Pokemon MMORPG - PokemonCraft 19 (34.5%)
Pirgah, CeFurkan, barlendo, firebast, bojovnik, kaiko, TeckTonik, ZHAN, serseri_41_1907, PhoenixTR, Skywalker, Pichuman, ash_on, brkekinci, yenilmez12, sezgin2x, afilliaynasiz, hao chen, max_musquetar@yahoo.com
Tampering with votes = ban under the vash'n'mammycakes regime; I don't know what 4Sword plans to have done about it; but uh. Disqualification anyway should be imminent.
ZFGC's PotM is for ZFGC users BY ZFGC users; not everyone you can invite in to vote for you.
~For a good read, click me~ (http://www.zfgc.com/forum/index.php?topic=33015.0)
That is why I think that the name should be a respected ZFGC member, before anonymous voting is allowed. But here is the dilemma. I think that CeFurkan invited other people in, people that "might" (with might being the keyword) become real members of ZFGC. I don't think CeFurkan made those accounts on his own. It won't be any good to scare those people away for ballot stuffing.
That is why I think before people can vote (anonymous) they should have posted a X number of post in a Y number of different boards. Or have a project going on ZFGC themselves.
Some of the names of the people who registered were also the usernames of some of the people on the Turkish version of his forum; so yeah the accounts that joined and voted either were just people from there he told to vote or possibly accounts [he] registered to vote. But meh, it kind of goes unsaid because it is implied by it being here that voting for things like this is meant for the users here - if someone comes here to just vote for a project and then just goes away, like they don't make an effort to be here, then their vote isn't really valid.
I posted this in the Post Report Feed board around the time that it was reported:Some of the names of the people who registered were also the usernames of some of the people on the Turkish version of his forum; so yeah the accounts that joined and voted either were just people from there he told to vote or possibly accounts [he] registered to vote. But meh, it kind of goes unsaid because it is implied by it being here that voting for things like this is meant for the users here - if someone comes here to just vote for a project and then just goes away, like they don't make an effort to be here, then their vote isn't really valid.
So yeah, it is tough cookies but his project's nomination is revoked or won't be considered a winner. There aren't any bugs in our rules or anything, we just have the right to define our voting system how we want to. Any claims that this is unfair have less validity than the potential loss to other projects here who are worked on and voted on by forum members who go here; and everyone who voted for PokemonCraft only voted for that game.
Well the point remains that it's 'ballot stuffing'. You can't just invite your friends to vote for you on a private forum :p it makes the meaning of the whole thing null and void.
I vote:
Ode to Zelda GB: Real nice game and I hope that the revision becomes even better.
The Myth of Heroa: A real good homage to the NES Zelda. Just love it.
OOT2D Map Project: A project with a lot of potential to be actually used in a game one day.
I vote:
Ode to Zelda GB: Real nice game and I hope that the revision becomes even better.
The Myth of Heroa: A real good homage to the NES Zelda. Just love it.
OOT2D Map Project: A project with a lot of potential to be actually used in a game one day.
Not even gonna lie, but I agree and vote with this as well.
Cool- my game's a nominee! And it's only been going on this forum for a couple of days XD!As long as there have been posts of progress or is newly added this month then it is viable to be nominated.
I've disqualified the pokemon project from voting due to it getting an unfair amount of outside support.
Further discussion is in the Feedback section so place regard the matter here closed.
So yeah, it is tough cookies but his project's nomination is revoked or won't be considered a winner. There aren't any bugs in our rules or anything, we just have the right to define our voting system how we want to. Any claims that this is unfair have less validity than the potential loss to other projects here who are worked on and voted on by forum members who go here; and everyone who voted for PokemonCraft only voted for that game.
I've disqualified the pokemon project from voting due to it getting an unfair amount of outside support.
Further discussion is in the Feedback section so place regard the matter here closed.
wow this is not fair
as long as they are different people nominating
it should be counted
Honestly, I thought you'd realize by now that doing stuff like this and making all those claims back in your project's topic is just tarnishing its image.I've disqualified the pokemon project from voting due to it getting an unfair amount of outside support.
Further discussion is in the Feedback section so place regard the matter here closed.
wow this is not fair
as long as they are different people nominating
it should be counted
Yeah, right. The pokemon game just jumped from zero to seventeen votes.I didn't know there was money involved in the PotM prizes, who witholds this information from all but one contestant :P?
I suspect a serious case of fraud here!
I've disqualified the pokemon project from voting due to it getting an unfair amount of outside support.
Further discussion is in the Feedback section so place regard the matter here closed.
wow this is not fair
as long as they are different people nominating
it should be counted
Yeah I remember there used to be stuff like that, I was just saying he's taking this vote too seriously :pYeah, right. The pokemon game just jumped from zero to seventeen votes.I didn't know there was money involved in the PotM prizes, who witholds this information from all but one contestant :P?
I suspect a serious case of fraud here!
XD Well; we used to have real world prizes when we'd do the contests... Things like GM keys that we paid for to other things... It would be nice to do that sorta stuff again to add incentive.
Catch 22 is to do real world prizes, we need active ad revenue (which does not belong to any current active staff), or donations :P