I read an article that stated ten very important expectations for 3DS that I hope Nintendo takes into consideration. Here is a list on some immensly important ideas.Considering that it's about 1 real minute = 1 in-game hour, I don't think anyone would enjoy riding Epona for 72 minutes in a row without doing anything.
Since SM64DS was released, we have been begging Nintendo to make OoTDS. What better way to do this than with 3D features. Majora's Mas would be even better for such a thing. Imagine your riding Epona across Termina Field, but then, Oh No!, themoon smashes into you becuase you spent up too much time.[/li][/list]
Although PH and ST made very good use for the touchscreen, but doesn't everyone one agree they should make an optional joystick or D-pad option for controls? (P.S.: How did D-pad get to be known as D-pad?)Well, the joystick would be an attachment to the D-Pad. And really? You don't know? Directional pad!
Add some of the real world. Imagine, having TP, in the palm of your hands, and zant's head throws an attack towards you in 3D. As much as I think TWW style is best for handhelds, adding real world attributes in the third demention would be in the making for an excellent game.TP wouldn't fit on a DS game cart, genius.
With the added avancments in the new DS, we can easily bring back old classics such as ALttP to the DS. Many classics have been revived and been use on handhelds. Why not give another chance at ALttP-Handheld?Ummm... wait for them to release it via DSiWare or something...
Tilting is a definite acomplishment for the DS. Why not utilising it a little more to ZDS3D? If they make OoT2D, one use of the tilting action could be to twist the forest temple. Or in MM2D, apon gaining the ability, you can tilt the Stone Tower at will.[/li][/list]Nintendo will never remake any 3D games in 2D. That realm belongs solely to fan game developers like Xfixium. And we've already had tilting, on the GBC (Kirby's Tilt 'n Tumble) and GBA (WarioWare: Twisted!). So it's nothing new.
The Vitility sensor is something added to ZWii that checks your pulsation. The more you get scared or freaked out by an enemy, the harder they become. It works kind of like a lie detector.If this is 3DS Expectations, why did you list something for Wii?
ST had a larger overworld than TP did, but it felt smaller than it becuase there was so much limitation to the game. No doubt, ZDS3D would have a larger overworld. (That is if they make it.) If they don't use too many limitations, than it will really pull you into the world of Hyrule. Especialy if it is in 3D.Ummm... I think you're wrong on that... otherwise PH would have a larger OW since, unless I'm mistaken, the PH and ST overworlds are the same size. And technically, the OW is everything that isn't indoors or underground. Therefore, I think TP did, in fact, have the larger overworld.
There isn't much to say about this, but cutscenes need to be more elaborate. Although they have been weekened in most handheld games, they definitly need to use it more and make the more interactive. Especialy if they are going to make it 3D.How can they elaborate on cutscenes more, when cutscenes are basically just scenes that flesh out the story? And that's up to the developers, not Nintendo.
We now have a very overqualified game executor. We have the D-pad, touch screens, Z-targeting possibilities, vitility sensors, motion sensors, tilting, and third demention possibilities. We probably have more stuff then I know of, which overlyqualifies Nintendo for making a phonominal Zelda expierence that can make use of all of these features without abusing, or givving too many limitations to the actions.Hey, there's no Z-button, hence no Z-targeting.
Nintendo really needs to start making people want to buy Wii and DS games. This probably isn't good for people who have only one (like me). What I mean is, how bout making TWW for wii, PH for 3DS, ST for Wii, and you get my points. (Abvoisly not those exact games.)They already have; both the DS and Wii have unique control schemes, and there's also the buying power that Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Smash Bros, and other venerable series bring to the plate.
As such, Nintendo better not holdback in there next DS title. They are probably working on a ne title as we speak. They wee working on PH before TP's title was announced, and looks at what is happening to ZWii... What do you think?TP was *technically* announced back in 2004, if memory serves. Around the same time the DS Phat came out. So that is probably another false tidbit you've provided.
I read an article that stated ten very important expectations for 3DS that I hope Nintendo takes into consideration. Here is a list on some immensly important ideas.As such, Nintendo better not holdback in there next DS title. They are probably working on a ne title as we speak. They wee working on PH before TP's title was announced, and looks at what is happening to ZWii... What do you think?
- Since SM64DS was released, we have been begging Nintendo to make OoTDS. What better way to do this than with 3D features. Majora's Mas would be even better for such a thing. Imagine your riding Epona across Termina Field, but then, Oh No!, themoon smashes into you becuase you spent up too much time.
- Although PH and ST made very good use for the touchscreen, but doesn't everyone one agree they should make an optional joystick or D-pad option for controls? (P.S.: How did D-pad get to be known as D-pad?)
- Add some of the real world. Imagine, having TP, in the palm of your hands, and zant's head throws an attack towards you in 3D. As much as I think TWW style is best for handhelds, adding real world attributes in the third demention would be in the making for an excellent game.
- With the added avancments in the new DS, we can easily bring back old classics such as ALttP to the DS. Many classics have been revived and been use on handhelds. Why not give another chance at ALttP-Handheld?
- Tilting is a definite acomplishment for the DS. Why not utilising it a little more to ZDS3D? If they make OoT2D, one use of the tilting action could be to twist the forest temple. Or in MM2D, apon gaining the ability, you can tilt the Stone Tower at will.
- The Vitility sensor is something added to ZWii that checks your pulsation. The more you get scared or freaked out by an enemy, the harder they become. It works kind of like a lie detector.
- ST had a larger overworld than TP did, but it felt smaller than it becuase there was so much limitation to the game. No doubt, ZDS3D would have a larger overworld. (That is if they make it.) If they don't use too many limitations, than it will really pull you into the world of Hyrule. Especialy if it is in 3D.
- There isn't much to say about this, but cutscenes need to be more elaborate. Although they have been weekened in most handheld games, they definitly need to use it more and make the more interactive. Especialy if they are going to make it 3D.
- We now have a very overqualified game executor. We have the D-pad, touch screens, Z-targeting possibilities, vitility sensors, motion sensors, tilting, and third demention possibilities. We probably have more stuff then I know of, which overlyqualifies Nintendo for making a phonominal Zelda expierence that can make use of all of these features without abusing, or givving too many limitations to the actions.
- Nintendo really needs to start making people want to buy Wii and DS games. This probably isn't good for people who have only one (like me). What I mean is, how bout making TWW for wii, PH for 3DS, ST for Wii, and you get my points. (Abvoisly not those exact games.)
> .> Why would you remake something that was just made... You completly missed my point there.
- A remake of PH/ST would also be horrible. There's not enough demand for that anyway, so it'd be a waste of Nintendo's money.
To be honest, you know they are going to do something like that anyway.
- Zant throwing an attack at what? Your thumb? It wouldn't feel intense at all, but rather... novelty
Yes, but a game shouldn't be obessesed on any single feature.
- Anything that draws you away from the screen is a bad thing. Tilting is a bad thing.
Yes I have. Look t them both and compare. If ST didn't have the limitations of what the train added, it has a way larger terrain than TP does. But, TP feels bigger becuase the lack of limitations.
- Wait, WHAT?... Have you played either of those games? Larger overworld my ass.
What does jrpg stand for? (Something-with-a-"j" role playing game?)
- Zelda isn't a jrpg. It doesn't need super elaborate cutscenes.
What I am saying is that they should use everything not to much, but not too little, just at a moderate amount.
- You're saying the new features shouldn't be abused, but also say the vitality sensor should be used in a zelda game... I'm having a really hard time following these :/
I never said they shouldn't take too much time into it. What I said is that they should make dirrect sequals and reverse in terms of release.[/list]
- If they want people to buy them, they should actually put some time into them instead of making waggletron features like motion sensors and "3d screens".
- What was your point then? They'd have to remake the games to add D-Pad controls into it!> .> Why would you remake something that was just made... You completly missed my point there.
- A remake of PH/ST would also be horrible. There's not enough demand for that anyway, so it'd be a waste of Nintendo's money.
To be honest, you know they are going to do something like that anyway.
- Zant throwing an attack at what? Your thumb? It wouldn't feel intense at all, but rather... novelty
Yes, but a game shouldn't be obessesed on any single feature.
- Anything that draws you away from the screen is a bad thing. Tilting is a bad thing.
Yes I have. Look t them both and compare. If ST didn't have the limitations of what the train added, it has a way larger terrain than TP does. But, TP feels bigger becuase the lack of limitations.
- Wait, WHAT?... Have you played either of those games? Larger overworld my ass.
What does jrpg stand for? (Something-with-a-"j" role playing game?)
- Zelda isn't a jrpg. It doesn't need super elaborate cutscenes.
What I am saying is that they should use everything not to much, but not too little, just at a moderate amount.
- You're saying the new features shouldn't be abused, but also say the vitality sensor should be used in a zelda game... I'm having a really hard time following these :/
I never said they shouldn't take too much time into it. What I said is that they should make dirrect sequals and reverse in terms of release.[/list]
- If they want people to buy them, they should actually put some time into them instead of making waggletron features like motion sensors and "3d screens".
Considering that it's about 1 real minute = 1 in-game hour, I don't think anyone would enjoy riding Epona for 72 minutes in a row without doing anything.You know what I ment...
Well, the joystick would be an attachment to the D-Pad. And really? You don't know? Directional pad!I didn't. :P
TP wouldn't fit on a DS game cart, genius.I ment using the TP style in a 3D game that is also handheld.
Ummm... wait for them to release it via DSiWare or something...That is kind of what I ment.
Nintendo will never remake any 3D games in 2D. That realm belongs solely to fan game developers like Xfixium. And we've already had tilting, on the GBC (Kirby's Tilt 'n Tumble) and GBA (WarioWare: Twisted!). So it's nothing new.Sorry, the 2D was a typo, I ment 3D. And I know it has been used before. I never said it was anything new.
If this is 3DS Expectations, why did you list something for Wii?Becuase, I'm trying to say it would be better used in a handheld than attaching something to your finger while you play on a wii remote.
Ummm... I think you're wrong on that... otherwise PH would have a larger OW since, unless I'm mistaken, the PH and ST overworlds are the same size. And technically, the OW is everything that isn't indoors or underground. Therefore, I think TP did, in fact, have the larger overworld.Nope, ST had over double the area of PH. Which is also larger than TP.
How can they elaborate on cutscenes more, when cutscenes are basically just scenes that flesh out the story? And that's up to the developers, not Nintendo.Well, what I ment is its just an area were the player is left doing nothing which slowly but surely, looses the players interest.
Hey, there's no Z-button, hence no Z-targeting.Actualy, the 3DS does have a Z-button. (Although not called that.)
They already have; both the DS and Wii have unique control schemes, and there's also the buying power that Mario, Zelda, Metroid, Smash Bros, and other venerable series bring to the plate.What I ment is, they'd get the players attention by making a dirrect sequal to the Wii game on the DS. (And vice verca.) Which would make them want to buy more DSs/Wiis
TP was *technically* announced back in 2004, if memory serves. Around the same time the DS Phat came out. So that is probably another false tidbit you've provided.I thought the DS was announced the same year as the DS?
One last thing: if you're going to provide facts, or reference an article, provide links please so we know you're not making this all up.Verywell.
- Hastily making games to sell more systems is not Nintendo's policy, as I've already stated. Just because you think they should doesn't mean they magically will!Wil you try to grasp what I am saying here? I said they should take 3 or 4 years making a game. Then make the next game a dirrect sequal. I at no point said for them to hastly make it.
- There are few direct sequels in the Zelda series (as was explained in your Z2 topic).The reason I locked the topic is because people kept linking it to another game. The only time I mentioned another game is when I said at some point, ganon was defeated before Z2.
- We've already established that PH/ST should've had a D-Pad option; that complaint is now off the table.Agreed. When I said DS should have a D-pad option, I ment for non-already-existing games.
- TP Style is just OoT/MM style, but better looking due to better graphics. Just like AC style for FF7 is the original style but with BETTER GRAPHICS!What are you dirrecting this part too?
- What did you mean about MM? That's exactly what you said. I merely elaborated upon the implied facts, bringing them to the forefront to prove you wrong.What I ment by the MM thing is that the 3D effects would make it look like hte moon really is cashing onto you.
- To elaborate upon Mammy's reply above this, I think the only reason that the ST OW would look bigger that TP's is the reduced viewpoint. You can see much more in a glance in TP than in ST. But "looks like" isn't a standard of measurement, I'm afraid.Actualy, on the looks-like thing, TP is much bigger. But if you look at the pixils and details, (heck the details) ST has more area is what I mean. I'll try giving you my proof in a legal way...
The rest of my points are in my second post that you still haven't replied to.Actualy, I replied to your second post in my post to you under the update.
The TP Style? Maybe to this:- Hastily making games to sell more systems is not Nintendo's policy, as I've already stated. Just because you think they should doesn't mean they magically will!Wil you try to grasp what I am saying here? I said they should take 3 or 4 years making a game. Then make the next game a dirrect sequal. I at no point said for them to hastly make it.- There are few direct sequels in the Zelda series (as was explained in your Z2 topic).The reason I locked the topic is because people kept linking it to another game. The only time I mentioned another game is when I said at some point, ganon was defeated before Z2.- We've already established that PH/ST should've had a D-Pad option; that complaint is now off the table.Agreed. When I said DS should have a D-pad option, I ment for non-already-existing games.- TP Style is just OoT/MM style, but better looking due to better graphics. Just like AC style for FF7 is the original style but with BETTER GRAPHICS!What are you dirrecting this part too?- What did you mean about MM? That's exactly what you said. I merely elaborated upon the implied facts, bringing them to the forefront to prove you wrong.What I ment by the MM thing is that the 3D effects would make it look like hte moon really is cashing onto you.- To elaborate upon Mammy's reply above this, I think the only reason that the ST OW would look bigger that TP's is the reduced viewpoint. You can see much more in a glance in TP than in ST. But "looks like" isn't a standard of measurement, I'm afraid.Actualy, on the looks-like thing, TP is much bigger. But if you look at the pixils and details, (heck the details) ST has more area is what I mean. I'll try giving you my proof in a legal way...The rest of my points are in my second post that you still haven't replied to.Actualy, I replied to your second post in my post to you under the update.
Add some of the real world. Imagine, having TP, in the palm of your hands, and zant's head throws an attack towards you in 3D. As much as I think TWW style is best for handhelds, adding real world attributes in the third demention would be in the making for an excellent game.And this:
I ment using the TP style in a 3D game that is also handheld.Twice you mentioned TP style. Thus, you just contradicted yourself. Don't want me to say that? Then don't do it!
Well, ever been to an Imax 3d movie?.......Weird you mention that becuase I'm going to a 3D movie tomorow.
The 3d only works within the screen. Things "moving towards you" will lose that effect once it becomes too big for the screen.Well, doy! Everyone knows that! And to this date, the only commonly used solution to explain what happens when they do that is that it crashes on the screen or a liquad splatters on the lens.
Okay, now think about it this way- the screens are going to be as small if not smaller then your hands. You are literally only going to see things pop a small amount, and it's not even enough to care. Even further, for such an effect to work properly, it means your 3DS will come with... *gasp* glasses for it. It'll be horrible. The effect isn't going to be anything you're thinking it will be.You people have no faith what so ever. (Or atleast arn't showing anything.)
Also, the 3DS uses the tilting; 3D glasses are not required nor are they needed. So all your points regarding that are bunk. Sure, it may look like it but it's not how you're describing it at all! It's more like this:
(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y194/dakirbymaster/Dinowobble.gif)
Twice you mentioned TP style. Thus, you just contradicted yourself. Don't want me to say that? Then don't do it!The problem with the both of us is that nieter of us likes being told we are wrong and won't take no as an answer. Hence, causing our constant arguements. Its just a clash of two people with the same personality. I am sorry. Also, I wasn't contradicting myself. I was just asking which you were refering to there. You overuse the exuse of contradiction.
Also, the 3DS uses the tilting; 3D glasses are not required nor are they needed. So all your points regarding that are bunk. Sure, it may look like it but it's not how you're describing it at all! It's more like this: *Jurastic Park Image*That is actualy exactly what I was trying to point out.
Excuuuse me? I'm afraid you're mistaken. We DO NOT have the same personality. I'll freely admit when I'm wrong; you have to have it hammered into your head before you'll admit defeat.Twice you mentioned TP style. Thus, you just contradicted yourself. Don't want me to say that? Then don't do it!The problem with the both of us is that nieter of us likes being told we are wrong and won't take no as an answer. Hence, causing our constant arguements. Its just a clash of two people with the same personality. I am sorry. Also, I wasn't contradicting myself. I was just asking which you were refering to there. You overuse the exuse of contradiction.
Also, the 3DS uses the tilting; 3D glasses are not required nor are they needed. So all your points regarding that are bunk. Sure, it may look like it but it's not how you're describing it at all! It's more like this: *Jurastic Park Image*That is actualy exactly what I was trying to point out.
Regardless of all that. I guess I was wrong.Happy? Oh my gosh! I am contradicting myself! Small Text. > .<
Well, I see your point, Mammy. My point is that it also works more like the image I posted: small scale = not as much 3D as he's describingI'm a girl! >:(
Well how was I to know that!You didn't notice the marin in my PMs? Or did you think Link was transgender?
Hmm... maybe if you didn't share your account...
Just like AC style for FF7 is the original style but with BETTER GRAPHICS!
P.S.: What exactly is animal crossing about?
QuoteJust like AC style for FF7 is the original style but with BETTER GRAPHICS!
I'm sorry, I was reading the thread and I saw this and just..had to stop.
...WHAT?! How the hell can you call those the same style? O_o
So its like a N64 kids' version of The Sims.QuoteP.S.: What exactly is animal crossing about?To be completely honest...nothing. Absolutely nothing. You get a house and live your life with a bunch of animals. Pretty fun game for a while, I have to say.
So its like a N64 kids' version of The Sims.QuoteP.S.: What exactly is animal crossing about?To be completely honest...nothing. Absolutely nothing. You get a house and live your life with a bunch of animals. Pretty fun game for a while, I have to say.
You must confuse reality and gaming world like that. (Especialy if they make it in the 3DS. X .x!)
I was joking... My point was, he'd probably be even more addicted to the 3DS. :PYou must confuse reality and gaming world like that. (Especialy if they make it in the 3DS. X .x!)I would assume only someone without any form of mental capacity would confuse reality with a cheap 3d effect...
Ummm.. no not at all. In Animal Crossing (which was only on the 64 in Japan), you move into a house in a rural town. You fully control your character. You can fish, catch bugs, dig up fossils, make clothing.I know, I just got a patched rom of it for Project64. The patch translated some words to english, but it was still impossible to play without knowing japanease. (Got upto the part were you have to write and deliver a letter.)
All 360 titles, since I sold my other consoles so I could buyAhahahaha.condoms,drugs,music (jk lol i torrent that)...stuff. >_>
All 360 titles, since I sold my other consoles so I could buyAhahahaha.condoms,drugs,music (jk lol i torrent that)...stuff. >_>
Get a job.
Ahahahaha.All 360 titles, since I sold my other consoles so I could buyAhahahaha.condoms,drugs,music (jk lol i torrent that)...stuff. >_>
Get a job.
Ahahahaha.
Illegally I already have one...!
(God I seriously !@#$% hate with a burning passion speculative mockup !@#$% when it comes to new systems. Every !@#$% time it's the most retarded looking designs and people either buy into them like morons, or they help sling the godaweful !@#$% all over the internet hoping to get people to buy into it. Seriously. "Fans" have ruined Nintendo and everything Nintendo.)I agree. And as I said, there is a 0.0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000001 chance that any of these are really by nintendo, who'd have posted it on their website unless it was an image leak. And even if it were, it is in early development. The design for it could possibly change 8 times before E3 and between then and release. :P
Would the 3DS really be early in development if there'll *supposedly* be a playable version at E3, which is in less than two months? If a playable version will be ready that soon, then I don't think it's *that* early in development. In fact, that probably means it's relatively far along... There won't be enough time for the design to change that drastically in that little amount of time. Pull yourself into reality, Random. Not everything can happen that severely that quickly.When I say early in development I mean that it isn't near release, but it is inough along the way. My point is, what if nintendo has three possible designes read and they have to decide or something like that. There are possibilities, but as I said, it is unlikely. Remember, Never say Never (Such a cliche :P), becuase there is always a possibilitie.
Also, it will *most likely* have the same basic design as all DS line systems. A top screen with speakers, and a bottom screen with the buttons and stuff.Look at the three GBA designs. The Gameboy Advance, the Gameboy Advance SP, and the Gameboy Advance micro all looked drasticly different.
Stop posting BS speculation, Random.All I was doing was posting the "clamed to be official" 3DS images.
Living in a fantasy world of "what if" is exactly what ruins things in the gaming industry.Believing a world with "what if" is a fantasy, is in fact a fantasy. If it weren't for "what if" there would be no human development, curosity, or life. The world would chaos. Also, the gaming industry is group of companies who make challenges for the player in a world that is altered by "what if". For instance, Z1: What if there was a alternate world were a pig seized a legendery item known as the Triforce of Power and a young hero had too defeat the beast to save the world.
People who start imagining all sorts of relatively retarded !@#$% for the next trend, and start spilling !@#$% all over the internet.If it weren't for people who start imaginating, this website would be nonexsistant.
"THIS is how it's going to be!" when in fact it's nothing like that at all.I am not saying this is how it is going to be. I am saying they are deaming just that and there is practicly no chance of it, but there is a possibilites. (There is ALWAYS a possibility!)
Also; both yours and Mirby's newest posts could probably have been made edits instead of new posts <_<;;Sorry. I sometimes double post becuase I worry that people wouldn't notice an update.
Sorry. I sometimes double post becuase I worry that people wouldn't notice an update.
Random, why do you go off on wild-ass tangents when people refute your points? Don't be so defensive; it harms your case more than it helps. And how is "what if?" responsible for human development and life? I'm pretty sure millions of years of random things happening were responsible for life. Seeing as there was nothing to think "what if?" before life, it can't be responsible for life. And it's not "what if this world existed?" It's an original interactive story! Your point makes no sense whatsoever and is therefore completely invalid! We're only trying to help you here. We're not on a mission to prove that you're completely wrong and that we hate you, ya know. (and don't bring up the so-called grudge; I've dropped it, it's time you did too.)Living in a fantasy world of "what if" is exactly what ruins things in the gaming industry.Believing a world with "what if" is a fantasy, is in fact a fantasy. If it weren't for "what if" there would be no human development, curosity, or life. The world would chaos. Also, the gaming industry is group of companies who make challenges for the player in a world that is altered by "what if". For instance, Z1: What if there was a alternate world were a pig seized a legendery item known as the Triforce of Power and a young hero had too defeat the beast to save the world.
Imaginating? That's not even a word. We don't imagine retarded things like OMG THE NEXT DS WILL HAVE THREE SCREENS! DS stands for Dual or Double Screen; therefore if it had three screens it wouldn't be a DS, now would it? And we just imagine what we want; not everything ties together the way you see it.People who start imagining all sorts of relatively retarded !@#$% for the next trend, and start spilling !@#$% all over the internet.If it weren't for people who start imaginating, this website would be nonexsistant.
Yes, anything is possible. But you have to factor in probability. Sure, a giant walrus could fall from the sky and sink Florida, that's possible. But it's completely improbable."THIS is how it's going to be!" when in fact it's nothing like that at all.I am not saying this is how it is going to be. I am saying they are deaming just that and there is practicly no chance of it, but there is a possibilites. (There is ALWAYS a possibility!)
Well, stop worrying.Also; both yours and Mirby's newest posts could probably have been made edits instead of new posts <_<;;Sorry. I sometimes double post becuase I worry that people wouldn't notice an update.
Living in a fantasy world of "what if" is exactly what ruins things in the gaming industry.Believing a world with "what if" is a fantasy, is in fact a fantasy. If it weren't for "what if" there would be no human development, curosity, or life. The world would chaos. Also, the gaming industry is group of companies who make challenges for the player in a world that is altered by "what if". For instance, Z1: What if there was a alternate world were a pig seized a legendery item known as the Triforce of Power and a young hero had too defeat the beast to save the world.
People who start imagining all sorts of relatively retarded !@#$% for the next trend, and start spilling !@#$% all over the internet.If it weren't for people who start imaginating, this website would be nonexsistant.
"THIS is how it's going to be!" when in fact it's nothing like that at all.I am not saying this is how it is going to be. I am saying they are deaming just that and there is practicly no chance of it, but there is a possibilites. (There is ALWAYS a possibility!)
responsible for human development and life?Not so much life as in "he's alive!" but life as in a way of life. What if raised plants? What if we made a machine to wright things? What if we make a rising and falling room that allows one to go up floors without the use of stair cases?
it's time you did tooI'm not holding a grudge. > .>
Imaginating? That's not even a word. We don't imagine retarded things like OMG THE NEXT DS WILL HAVE THREE SCREENS! DS stands for Dual or Double Screen; therefore if it had three screens it wouldn't be a DS, now would it? And we just imagine what we want; not everything ties together the way you see it.You know that I ment Imagining. >:( I never said there would be three screens. > .>
Yes, anything is possible. But you have to factor in probability. Sure, a giant walrus could fall from the sky and sink Florida, that's possible. But it's completely improbable.That is exactly my point. It is highly improbable that any of these are of the real 3DS, but it is possible.
Well, stop worrying.Sorry. > .<
I don't know how old you are, but I assume if you've been on the internet longer then 8 years.I'm 22 and I've been on the internet for a long time. (But I've only known english for a few years.)
What if I design stupid mock-ups for a system? What if I think they're real?responsible for human development and life?Not so much life as in "he's alive!" but life as in a way of life. What if raised plants? What if we made a machine to wright things? What if we make a rising and falling room that allows one to go up floors without the use of stair cases?
It's your go-to complaint when I refute your points... but enough on this subject...it's time you did tooI'm not holding a grudge. > .>
You posted a pic of one with three screens, therefore you did.Imaginating? That's not even a word. We don't imagine retarded things like OMG THE NEXT DS WILL HAVE THREE SCREENS! DS stands for Dual or Double Screen; therefore if it had three screens it wouldn't be a DS, now would it? And we just imagine what we want; not everything ties together the way you see it.You know that I ment Imagining. >:( I never said there would be three screens. > .>
No, you said they could be. Once again, you're contradicting yourself. Stop.Yes, anything is possible. But you have to factor in probability. Sure, a giant walrus could fall from the sky and sink Florida, that's possible. But it's completely improbable.That is exactly my point. It is highly improbable that any of these are of the real 3DS, but it is possible.
Also, some people may make quote pyramids and may get confused if one quote is nameless. Can you please list the name of the person who made the quote in the tag?You're the only one getting confused. Most people know they can scroll up to the original post...
What if I design stupid mock-ups for a system? What if I think they're real?Everything in the world is created by two main factors: "what if" and accidental/natural. I also agree that both of these can be furthur catagorized, but this is the main reasons.
What if is not the reason for everything. For instance, the machine for writing was just a natural evolution of the pencil, which was a natural evolution for the quill and ink... And the elevator? It was designed so people wouldn't have to climb tens of flights of stairs to get to their destination, it wasn't a WHAT IF for that reason.
It's your go-to complaint when I refute your points... but enough on this subject...I just said that once. > .> You say I said one thing a million times, but then you contadict yourself. (Like how you said I use the language excuse a million times when I only said that once.)
You posted a pic of one with three screens, therefore you did.It's not like I made the image.
No, you said they could be. Once again, you're contradicting yourself. Stop.Contradicting?... Could be and What if are the same thing. > .>
You're the only one getting confused. Most people know they can scroll up to the original post...Not when you take a fraction of a post that you can't find unless you use ctrl-f. (But it may be on another page also...)
Also, Mammy's honestly got much better refutations than me... WHY IS HE SO SMART? AND HANDSOME? I mean...0 .0;
What if I design stupid mock-ups for a system? What if I think they're real?Everything in the world is created by two main factors: "what if" and accidental/natural. I also agree that both of these can be furthur catagorized, but this is the main reasons.
What if is not the reason for everything. For instance, the machine for writing was just a natural evolution of the pencil, which was a natural evolution for the quill and ink... And the elevator? It was designed so people wouldn't have to climb tens of flights of stairs to get to their destination, it wasn't a WHAT IF for that reason.It's your go-to complaint when I refute your points... but enough on this subject...I just said that once. > .> You say I said one thing a million times, but then you contadict yourself. (Like how you said I use the language excuse a million times when I only said that once.)You posted a pic of one with three screens, therefore you did.It's not like I made the image.No, you said they could be. Once again, you're contradicting yourself. Stop.Contradicting?... Could be and What if are the same thing. > .>You're the only one getting confused. Most people know they can scroll up to the original post...Not when you take a fraction of a post that you can't find unless you use ctrl-f. (But it may be on another page also...)Also, Mammy's honestly got much better refutations than me... WHY IS HE SO SMART? AND HANDSOME? I mean...0 .0;
(http://media.techeblog.com/images/nintendo3ds.jpg)
I have a feeling this is what the 3DS is gonna look like... Oh wait, no I don't, because it's playing a gamecube game, only has 1 screen and looks nothing like the 3DS from the tech demo video.
Technically, you used the language excuse for as many posts as it was in your siggy, because it was technically always in your post. Therefore, you used it quite a few times.What kind of mixed logic are you using? When I realised I put it in the wrong area, I removed it.
And if you posted the pics, some part of you believed that it was possible that it was the design. Not probable, but you apparently don't believe in that.Were did I show that I didn't believe in that? This what I believed the whole time: It is possible that one of these are the design, but it isn't likely.
One last thing: Stop taking everything so personally and so seriously. If you can't handle the fact that very little on the internet is serious, you have no business being on it. First rule of the internet is to never take anything seriously! So stop it!Sorry, that is just the way I am. You have to take things serously. "Oh look, this website wants my credit card number so they can charge me $100 every mounth so I could look at a picture of a racoon." First rule of the internet is not reveal your whole life too the world that is unkown too you.
Random, youre a real smartass you know that?Was that ment as an insult?...
I ment, I'd like it too look like that. (It is just becuase I miss the Gamecub design. :P) But again, that is highly inprobable.