Well then let me talk more about the movie. #1, unlike Moore's film, they actually have intelligent guests. Experts on the subject, in fact, more than any other guests they actually have people interviewed from the movie who are upset about the way their comments were used falsely (which I still can't understand why we don't have a civil lawsuit going on from some of these people-- probably because it's not worth it, and the public image portrayed would be awful).
#2, they don't portray things with the amount of language and immaturity that Mr. Moore does.
#3, you can skip the darn Michael Moore movie and go strait to this, because they give background information, and show key scenes used in the movie.
Feel something Bush said was completely out of line? Watch this movie to see the parts of those speeches and appearances that they didn't show in the movie.
Want to hear about an angry newspaper company that had an article published by them misused (THEY had the nerves to demand an apology... naturally a refusal from Mr. Moore, because he's rich, fat, and white enough to get away with that-- note the description of Mr. Moore's actually making fun of his book "Stupid White Men", so don't accuse me of being bigoted, when I'm making fun of what the man said himself)? Then watch this movie.
Good show ^_^
