People get offended far too easily these days, plus people do things for money like "I know the guy who killed Timmy, I hired him" just for attention. !@#$%, it's considered offensive to touch people these days and people purposely let the 'wrong' thoughts of an act inside their head "omfg that kid is topless and an adult is touching him, omfg gay pedophile!" when really he's just treating a wound of an infant.
Anyways, that's not the point, but seriously...it was intended to be art, if it wasn't then that would raise questions but people want to raise questions for attention and money.
But yes, I'm sick of the bloody media going on about nudity in minors for art as being pornography. Let them be, nothing's hidden, it's an expression, seriously it's not like the 13 year old was posing like a pornstar or anything -_-. If it was a minor 'posing for the intention of sexual arousal' then perhaps yes, censor that. Only people with sick/twisted minds would think anything dirty about that picture, let it be their problem only *sigh*.