This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.

21

Entertainment / Re: Hidden Goron in ZWii

« on: April 27, 2010, 12:49:04 am »

Fine ignore my genuine Santa find, you bunch of bastards

22

Entertainment / Re: Hidden Goron in ZWii

« on: April 26, 2010, 11:57:01 pm »

no !@#$% seriously dude.

23

Entertainment / Re: Hidden Goron in ZWii

« on: April 26, 2010, 11:38:53 pm »

Is it bad that I'm seeing Santa striking a Dragonball Z-esque pose?

24

Entertainment / Re: When do we get games in 5D then?

« on: April 26, 2010, 07:11:42 pm »

Heck the only console that might actually force 3D on the user is the new DS, which would be another !@#$% poor move by nintendo.

I thought Nintendo said they were going to make it optioal no matter what.

They best had, cos it'd be a terrible move other wise, not only because the 3D technology wont be all that good, but also because not everyone has the ability to interpret 3D animation.

25

Entertainment / Re: When do we get games in 5D then?

« on: April 26, 2010, 10:12:33 am »

I think we are  along ways off from 3D gaming being mandatory, PS3 may be upgrading every single game to 3D but it's all optional. So I'm not to fussed.

Heck the only console that might actually force 3D on the user is the new DS, which would be another !@#$% poor move by nintendo.

As for how I feel over 3D gaming, not too fussed, as long as it stays optional until I get bored of gaming, 3D is something I'd use from time to time just cause really

26

Entertainment / Anyone else

« on: April 23, 2010, 08:23:34 pm »

watching Infinity ward slowly collapse? And laughing at Activision for being stupid !@#$%? I am :3

http://kotaku.com/5523154/four-more-out-at-modern-warfare-studio-infinity-ward

27

Entertainment / Re: Ready for REACH?

« on: April 22, 2010, 11:56:52 pm »

Just as valid as Xph... Xiph... Xsomethingorother's post. Only he gave reason. I do kind of agree with Slimmy, Halo 1 and 2 engine wise were near carbon copy, Halo 3 gave a few modifications to the engine (I mean let's face it, the engine worked amazingly anyway). I cant comment on the other games though because my interests just never really grew.

Actually, Halo 2's engine was build from the ground up.  There wasn't anything that was copied straight from Halo 1. 

O.o then they must of built it straight form the ground up and ended up with an exact copy? I dunno, I just felt they were the same when playing through, the way vehicles handled and weapons. Only difference was the worlds really. To me anyway.

28

Entertainment / Re: Ready for REACH?

« on: April 22, 2010, 09:09:27 pm »

!@#$%fallen is not my kind of person. I don't see what's so special with him after the like 5th post.

!@#$% you, I don't pick on your career choices

^I didn't provide a single reason for my statement. It's practically the same as saying "!@#$% sucks" and leaving it at that. To make matters worse, I threw in a little trolling by changing the name to something obscene

Like I said, you don't need to post your reasons when you post your opinion. Only need to give reason when you are posting facts (or delusions). Also it's a bit different, yours was "attacking" me, he was more so attacking the game. Fairplay if he'd of said "All Halo player's are bumbandits" then yeah I'd of understood.

Had I said something like "He only posts when he sees the opportunity to argue with someone else to help escalate the problems", it makes the statement more valid.

Could just say "being a !@#$% for !@#$%'s sake". Unless you're Canadian.

If you had read my post, you'd see that I was stating that the argument itself (and yes, it is an "argument" as it's explaining a viewpoint or stance to an existing stance) was invalid as it provided no counterpoints or reasoning.

It's not an argument though, because the topic at hand isn't a debate, and doesn't follow on like that, he was just simply stating his opinion as a reason to why he wont be getting REACH. (is it all caps or are we all just being retarded?)

Here's an example of a good response, as I tackle responding to an at least valid response

Anyway, Halo is completely milked IMO. Nothing has changed at all from Halo 1 to ODST and by the looks of it, REACH. All its been is a graphical update every time. The first game was a hit so they've just copied it everytime. Even REACH with its new engine looks completely the same.

Just as valid as Xph... Xiph... Xsomethingorother's post. Only he gave reason. I do kind of agree with Slimmy, Halo 1 and 2 engine wise were near carbon copy, Halo 3 gave a few modifications to the engine (I mean let's face it, the engine worked amazingly anyway). I cant comment on the other games though because my interests just never really grew.

29

Entertainment / Re: Ready for REACH?

« on: April 22, 2010, 07:14:51 pm »

Seriously; most retarded argument ever.

Really? Stating his opinion is the most retarded argument ever?

It was quite clearly written as his opinion aswell...

He's saying the argument is bad, not his opinion.  Granted, there is only his opinion

It wasn't an argument though, it wasn't even structured in the sense of an argument. It was just his opinion. Like I said It was quite clearly written as his opinion aswell... so there was no way it could of been misconstrued...

Also, you don't have to give reason as to why you dislike something, it's just enough to say you don't.

30

Entertainment / Re: Ready for REACH?

« on: April 22, 2010, 01:39:05 pm »

Seriously; most retarded argument ever.

Really? Stating his opinion is the most retarded argument ever?

It was quite clearly written as his opinion aswell...

Gaylo is not my type of game, and I don't see what is so great about it after its like 5th game.

Anyway; my interest in Halo is limited, I've got the 1st one for PC and love the custom edition (Cold Snap is amazing). Second one bored the living !@#$% out of me, yet I have fond memories of LAN parties, and making someone cry.

Halo 3 was crap minus one thing, and that was Forge mode.

The multiplayer was only good when you was playing with friends (LAN and what not), online was just full of prepubescent racists, hearing the n-bomb every 3 seconds by some 6 year old wannabe gangster with the literacy skills of an apple just does not apple to me.

31

Entertainment / Re: The Pacific

« on: April 21, 2010, 10:26:23 pm »

Watched it. Loving it.

HBO are awesome when it comes to war dramas; Band Of Brothers, Generation Kill and this are all fantastic pieces of work.

32

Entertainment / Re: Anyone else play MW2 pc regularly?

« on: April 19, 2010, 11:33:44 pm »

nah, mw2 multiplayer's way to broken.

33

Entertainment / Re: 3DS Topic

« on: April 18, 2010, 10:51:57 pm »

Oh god, is this going to be another Mirby vs Random?

34

Entertainment / Re: Am I going nuts or have I found a hidden message in this logo?

« on: April 16, 2010, 08:17:08 am »

Oh oh I love these things!
I see a........RABBIT

35

Entertainment / Re: Pokemon White People and Pokemon Black People.

« on: April 13, 2010, 05:22:54 pm »

I used to name my rivals "Fuckface". Yeah I was amused by it, shut up >_>

36

Entertainment / Re: Pokemon White People and Pokemon Black People.

« on: April 13, 2010, 12:56:59 pm »

yeah I lost track of the games after Ruby. Only ones I had were Red, Yellow, Gold and Ruby.

37

Entertainment / Re: OMG! ZWii Dated!

« on: April 08, 2010, 09:31:21 pm »

I think they make up release dates so they can sort out pre-orders or something. Pretty ridiculous considering there isn't even an ounce of information about it released yet.

38

Entertainment / Re: YouTube sucks

« on: April 02, 2010, 03:57:26 pm »

I thought you meant all the garbage that was on the layout, which is now gone.

What are you on about? O.o it's exactly the same as yesterday...

39

Entertainment / Re: YouTube sucks

« on: April 02, 2010, 12:57:06 pm »

I'll just stand here and be correct. Don't mind me.

40

Entertainment / Re: YouTube sucks

« on: April 01, 2010, 10:10:03 pm »

Why hello there brick wall, nice to be talking to you.

>_>

Seriously <_< counter point being that they beta tested it is stupid, because, uh. "Obviously they would beta test something that reworks their entire system, even if for one day".

so you mean they will go through months of planning, designing, beta testing, all of which reaches back to before 2010 even began, and all of which would of cost them a damn lot of money to do, just for a one day prank. Let's ignore the fact that this "new layout" isn't all that new and was in fact made available to partners (or most partners) months before today, and some non partner accounts got this new look before a few weeks ago. And I've even seen this layout a few weeks ago when I reformatted my laptop and had to re sign into youtube.