Fox News's CNN's Unbiased Campaign Fact Checking Team's Analysis of Grizzle Attack:
What do you think of Sarah Palin?
Why should some lousy creation be participating in this competition? She's just the actual Sarah Palin with a generic back story added on. That is not creative. It's characters like her who ruin the whole fun out of competitions like these. She's non-fictional while I am fiction. Why is this aloud? I dunno. Whatever, I blame America for all this as well as any other countries who create lousy non-fictional characters. I'm American too god dammit!
1) When a character's picture is nothing but a photograph of something unaltered just with text and rather boring I see that as "lousy".
2) The character is creative to the extreme and incredibly original. The creator took up not Sarah Palin the person, but Sarah Palin the media joke and crafted her into what the media/SNL personified her as. Anyone knows that this media-personified Palin is (for the most part) fictional.
3) It's "Allowed" not "Aloud"
4) If your American, and you're blaming America, wouldn't you be blaming yourself?
What do you think of her little campaign image?
You mean the "BEARS THE NUMBER 1 THREAT TO AMERICA!" thing? Seems pretty lame if you ask me because it just looks like a cry for attention. The fact that Stephen Colbert is in the picture is false advertising. I'm sure Colbert didn't even approve of this so the whole thing is false. The fact that I'm not a man-eating bear kinda defeats the purpose of her campaign image because I'm not threat at all. I'm an actor so I entertain. No wonder why her team didn't win the election. Grin
1) Not false advertising. It's giving credit to Stephen Colbert for his sound words of wisdom. If Colbert says it, it's fact.
2) The Definition of Bears:
Bears are soulless, godless, rampaging killing machines. They are Satan's minions and the TRUE symbol of evil. Once believed to be the work of dragons, Bears (like purple donkeys) enjoy running around the woods molesting and raping innocent people and squids. For years now, ravenous bears have had free reign to use our woods as their personal latrine, protected by their "endangered" status. Now the government is wisely considering ending the grizzlies' special treatment in order to protect our honey jars and Paddington Station. Bears' strong vitality and resilience makes them one of mother nature's nearly unkillable animals. A bear has never been downed by any less than five gunshots. Combinations of high explosives, assault weapons, and trebuchets have been known to only !@#$% the bear off. Why can man-kind put a man on the moon, but not invent a weapon that can take down Big-Yogi over there?
http://www.wikiality.com/BearsOverall analysis: Misleading attempt from the Grizzle Campaign
Message from Palin Campaign:
Vote Maverick!