ZFGC
Resources => Graphics => Topic started by: Link.57 on November 04, 2006, 11:52:52 pm
-
Here my TP monster in ALTTP style :
(http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/7952/tpmonstertw0.png)
Any comments ?
-
another trace. its out of perspective and wouldnt fit into a lttp style game
hah haha ha It looks like a trace from the exact same picture
(http://img237.imageshack.us/img237/1051/gehxg1.png)
but he could have done it by himself
-
Dude, how the crud could you think that's in LttP style? That's MUCH more like sidescrolling CD-i style.
It looks kewl, but PLEASE compare it with ANY other LttP sprite before you classify it as a LttP-type sprite.
-
Again, too obvious. It ain't even lttp-styled.
AND, the lineart is messy and it needsmore shading.
Dude, you lied to us about not tracing! Custom my ass
-
C'est vraiment degueulasse. Or something.
-
not alltp and it needs alot of work befor it realy looks like the real monster
-
Again, too obvious. It ain't even lttp-styled.
AND, the lineart is messy and it needsmore shading.
Dude, you lied to us about not tracing! Custom my ass
I don't tracing this monster with the screenshot. Stop now, please !
-
No, you stop. Most of us have been at this alot longer then you, we know a trace when we see one.
-
But you don't have to be so mean, you could at least think WHERE IT COULD BE USED >:(
I think it could be used in a sidescrolling room like in Zelda 1 where you get the bow in DGN 1
-
My point was, that that ain't custom, it's traced! And he dares to deny it!
If it's not from that screenshot, then it's from another one.
It COULD be used for sidescroller, but he said it's lttp-style, which it clearly isn't.
I'm sorry if i sound rude, but i'm just stating the truth here.
-
It could have been used as a reference image you know, and not as a trace. And we all know it doesnt really match Lttp style but hey, everyone needs practice especially when tackling these complex monsters in TP so please, don't flame people when you don't personally know the methods they used.
-
I knew all you did was trace from your Goht thing, when I said THAT was a trace.
This is a trace, quit lying.
-
Two points:
You can copy without tracing.
And something can be in LTTP style without being able to be used in an LTTP game.
The style of LTTP sprites was simple, dull colors with a grey outline and generally minimal shading.
The style of the LTTP game itself was a top-down Adventure.
So, it can still be LTTP style without being top-down.
As for tracing, theres no way to prove that it's a "trace" if he resized it. He could have used multiple mthods.
-
Two points:
You can copy without tracing.
And something can be in LTTP style without being able to be used in an LTTP game.
The style of LTTP sprites was simple, dull colors with a grey outline and generally minimal shading.
The style of the LTTP game itself was a top-down Adventure.
So, it can still be LTTP style without being top-down.
As for tracing, theres no way to prove that it's a "trace" if he resized it. He could have used multiple mthods.
Actually, if it was like you said, it would fit into thousands of styles.
It's not lttp-styled, because it's too big, wrong angled and the shading is wrong for the style.
-
The style of LTTP sprites was simple, dull colors with a grey outline and generally minimal shading.
The style of the LTTP game itself was a top-down Adventure.
The two go hand-in-hand and are what comprise the LttP style itself. That sprite is not LttP styled. It might fit in a side-scroller. Actually, I'm more inclined to call it small pixel art :p.
-
to me it looks traced,isnt lttp styled,and overal,its not so great.try to learn spriting easier things first,and then go for bigger things.
-
The style of LTTP sprites was simple, dull colors with a grey outline and generally minimal shading.
The style of the LTTP game itself was a top-down Adventure.
The two go hand-in-hand and are what comprise the LttP style itself. That sprite is not LttP styled. It might fit in a side-scroller. Actually, I'm more inclined to call it small pixel art :p.
But a sidescroller could be LTTP-styled, couldn't it?
Style ultimately decides visual chracteristics common to other works of the same style that create a continuous visual feel/connection between those works.
It is true that perspective could hypothetically be part of a style. But a number of works in the same perspective would most likely be seen as a study or series.
Given also that perspectives are not correct, possible, or constant in LTTP I don't think perspective can be considered a factor.