oh, I half-wrote that as an edited on tag-line without thinking it through (I've been standing up for practically 9 hours none stop for the love of Microsoft, I'm allowed to not think things through!). I meant the people who you suggest the book as an interesting read that could challenge their beliefs, and they instantly go on a bitchy rant about how they believe to strongly to challenge it (which makes no sense to me). Not just your average dude-religious-guy who actually looks at all angles before putting it down to devine fact (two words which seem to cancel each other out a lot
). Don't ask me why I put down "lets face it", I blame it on having to wake up an hour earlier every morining, and stand up for many hours at a time because of work experience.
Their are two kinds of people. Those who when you ask about their belief, and they say
"It is a belief based on my own experiences, and the current evidence I have experienced at the time, and may change."
and those that say
"It is an unchanging belief regardless of any evidence."
Which would you rather be?
and trust me, their are people like the latter. A scary amount as well...
Also notice when I try to make a point I generally include something along the lines of "In my opinion", "I think", or "as far as I can percieve.". These are great in debates because they make allowence for other people to accept that it is your belief that you are stating, without it seeming like you are trying to pressure it on other people as an absoulte fact.