Historical support. You know, simple things here and there, such as: http://www.beyondthisplanet.org/bible/No_mistakes/accurate_history1.htm
You can't be serious. That site is just stupid.
Then, an archaeologist discovered an ancient slab with writing on it. This mentioned that someone had had a battle with a nation of people called Hittites! The Bible was right! The following edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica contained lots if information about this people!
And the odyssey by Homer must also be totally correct because it mentions the Trojans, and they existed too! OMG!!
But Pharaoh got really angry. He forced the slaves to make bricks with clay and straw, then he made it harder by letting them use only stubble ( small, left over pieces of straw) with the clay.
Finally, they had only clay and nothing else.
For a long time, some people claimed that this part of the Bible was not real history at all, but just pretend stories. But one archaeologist proved that even tiny details, like the story of the bricks, were true.
He discovered an ancient building in Egypt, in the city of Pithon. The bottom of the walls used proper bricks, made of mud and straw. Further up the wall, middle layers were of bricks with mud and stubble. The archaeologists discovered that some of the stubble had been torn up by the roots! That is just what might have happened if a slave was rushing to make the quota of bricks that day. The top layers of bricks had no straw at all. They were just mud ??? exactly as the Bible recorded it!
That doesn't prove !@#$%. the only thing it proves (considering that the site is even credible, which I highly doubt) is that they used stubble. Also, may I please have a link to this archaeologist that supposedly found these things? That site seems to be seriously lacking in citations.
Archaeologists have discovered that the ruins of Jericho prove that the walls fell down ??? but not inwards, as if the army had battered them in. The bricks and rubble show that the walls fell outward! That was a miracle! No people would want to push their own city walls down from inside the city!
If a city is abandoned for a couple thousand years, what do you think the condition of the walls would be?
The archaeologists also found, inside the ruined city, pots full of grain. That proved that the city was not besieged and the people were not starved into defeat. The only explanation is that the Bible is right! The collapse of the walls and the defeat of Jericho was sudden.
Wouldn't you expect grain to rot after a thousand or so years? The author seems to miss the idea that the grain could've been brought there by the occupying force, or just be remnants of later attempts to live in the city.
Notice how the entire time the author of the site continually forgets to cite any sources. I'm going to totally throw away the credibility of this site.