Also, this raises the question: what if the girl has two lesbian moms?
Keep it clean guys. Serious topic.
Discrimination as a term, I guess, is not always of a negative connotation. All it means is a separation on the grounds of something.
who'd walk her down the aisle? the more feminine one i'd say.
who'd walk her down the aisle? the more feminine one i'd say.
But there might not be a more feminine one. Then what would they do? :P
who'd walk her down the aisle? the more feminine one i'd say.
But there might not be a more feminine one. Then what would they do? :P
Whoever was on top? XD
Whoever wears the pants.
Whoever wears the pants.
This.
Whoever wears the pants.
This.
What if they both do? What if they are equals in the relationship?
Or are your views too stereotypical and your brains too small to comprehend this? ;)
Whoever wears the pants.
This.
What if they both do? What if they are equals in the relationship?
Or are your views too stereotypical and your brains too small to comprehend this? ;)
Simple fact of nature... a pair of mates need a dominant and a submissive person. Can't both dominant or both submissive :P Just doesn't work.
Whoever wears the pants.
This.
What if they both do? What if they are equals in the relationship?
Or are your views too stereotypical and your brains too small to comprehend this? ;)
Simple fact of nature... a pair of mates need a dominant and a submissive person. Can't both dominant or both submissive :P Just doesn't work.
Whoever wears the pants.
This.
What if they both do? What if they are equals in the relationship?
Or are your views too stereotypical and your brains too small to comprehend this? ;)
Simple fact of nature... a pair of mates need a dominant and a submissive person. Can't both dominant or both submissive :P Just doesn't work.
So the dominant one takes the daughter down the aisle? Wont that be unfair for the submissive one?
Most typically, the dominant is the male...
serious topic
swiftu
They would reasonably discuss it and make the decision between themselves, based on rational discussion, like any good couple?
Screw dominant and submissive, most good relationships rely on a meeting of equals, who co-operate with one another. Mammy, if you think all relations boil down to dominance... well, that would explain a lot.
Anyway, it's quite often the bride-to-be who asks a father figure to walk her down the aisle; she'd either ask one of them in particular, another man (or even woman), or ask both fathers, and let them decide as I said before.
They would reasonably discuss it and make the decision between themselves, based on rational discussion, like any good couple?
Screw dominant and submissive, most good relationships rely on a meeting of equals, who co-operate with one another. Mammy, if you think all relations boil down to dominance... well, that would explain a lot.
Anyway, it's quite often the bride-to-be who asks a father figure to walk her down the aisle; she'd either ask one of them in particular, another man (or even woman), or ask both fathers, and let them decide as I said before.
Psychologically speaking, a lot of it has to do with having a dominant and submissive partner. If you have two of each the relationship doesn't work out, through pure psychology.
They would reasonably discuss it and make the decision between themselves, based on rational discussion, like any good couple?
Screw dominant and submissive, most good relationships rely on a meeting of equals, who co-operate with one another. Mammy, if you think all relations boil down to dominance... well, that would explain a lot.
Anyway, it's quite often the bride-to-be who asks a father figure to walk her down the aisle; she'd either ask one of them in particular, another man (or even woman), or ask both fathers, and let them decide as I said before.
Psychologically speaking, a lot of it has to do with having a dominant and submissive partner. If you have two of each the relationship doesn't work out, through pure psychology.
It's far too simplistic to boil it down to that; very few people are entirely dominant or submissive in all or even most respects; most people come down somewhere in the middle. Not only that, but even equally "dominant" or "submissive" people aren't doomed to have a failed relationship.
Alternate solutions:
-Daughter is feminist. Refuses to be "given away" at wedding.
-Daughter is lesbian and plays the part of groom.
I'm still thinking of others...
Men = Work.
Women = Make me a sandwich.
There's definitely dominant and submissive.
Men = Work.
Women = Make me a sandwich.
There's definitely dominant and submissive.
Not really. In a "traditional" relationship like that, the homemaker (usually a woman) chooses the domestic arrangements; not only what you eat, but you when you eat it, amongst many other things, while the money-earner is effectively in servitude to his or her job and forced into a linear daily schedule with little or no freedom within those hours.
Sounds to me like the man's the !@#$%. :P
Men = Work.
Women = Make me a sandwich.
There's definitely dominant and submissive.
Not really. In a "traditional" relationship like that, the homemaker (usually a woman) chooses the domestic arrangements; not only what you eat, but you when you eat it, amongst many other things, while the money-earner is effectively in servitude to his or her job and forced into a linear daily schedule with little or no freedom within those hours.
Sounds to me like the man's the !@#$%. :P
Apart from it's the man that beats his wife cos she isnt cooking damn well fast enough and he's hungry.
Men = Work.
Women = Make me a sandwich.
There's definitely dominant and submissive.
Not really. In a "traditional" relationship like that, the homemaker (usually a woman) chooses the domestic arrangements; not only what you eat, but you when you eat it, amongst many other things, while the money-earner is effectively in servitude to his or her job and forced into a linear daily schedule with little or no freedom within those hours.
Sounds to me like the man's the !@#$%. :P
Apart from it's the man that beats his wife cos she isnt cooking damn well fast enough and he's hungry.
Exactly. Kaede understands.
Because she beats her deadbeat wife all the time because she's such a damn !@#$% who never does any work.
And because men never ever suffer domestic abuse at the hands of their wives. Oh no.
Because she beats her deadbeat wife all the time because she's such a damn !@#$% who never does any work.
And because men never ever suffer domestic abuse at the hands of their wives. Oh no.
XFD Because you thought I was serious.
Because she beats her deadbeat wife all the time because she's such a damn !@#$% who never does any work.
And because men never ever suffer domestic abuse at the hands of their wives. Oh no.
XFD Because you thought I was serious.
Because she beats her deadbeat wife all the time because she's such a damn !@#$% who never does any work.
And because men never ever suffer domestic abuse at the hands of their wives. Oh no.
XFD Because you thought I was serious.
Of course it's serious; have you never met Kaede's wife? She's got bruises all over her. I feel sorry for the poor woman, but it's her own bloody fault; she's the only person I've met who takes a week to make spaghetti.
Yay for people on the internet completely misunderstanding the use and application of saracasm. -__-
I have actually been to a wedding with this situation. They both walked her down the isle. So yeah.