recommends women take a subservient role in marriage
What happened to equality? :S
You don't understand, do you? This is this man's opinion, and how he feels about how a marriage should be. What happened to equality? That's exactly the point he's making. With equality, he feels there is a higher chance of cheating. However, with the whole "Sex on demand" thing I can see how you feel he's saying women should act like hookers, but he really isn't. Hookers are disgusting, and there's a reason men don't want to spend their lives with a !@#$%, which is most likely what I just said at the start of this sentence. Really, the things he said women should do for their men are exactly what most men want. Sex without a fuss, (sure you can say no, but if you're constantly saying no he's obviously gonna get pissed off, and it really doesn't have to be as subservient as it sounds), praise for providing for the family (remember Kaede, men have HUGE egos, and if they don't feel like they're doing a good job providing, they'll of course feel like they're inadequate as a man), and when he said wear sexy underwear while cooking and cleaning in the privacy of your home, how does that equate to going around the streets in nothing but boxers?
It pisses me off how the media always jumps of men for the sake of women's rights. What about men's rights? "THIS IS BOOK IS A JOKE IT IS FOR IF YOU SEE SACRIFICING A HUMAN TO SUSTAIN IT" my god, a bit of subservience for the man who loves you isn't gonna detract you of your status as a human being. "THIS IS AN APPALING BOOK IT'S DOG TRAINING" Why such strong words? It's hardly dog training at all. And why such outrage about the book anyway? I see tons of stuff about how men are inferior to women and should be treated as such, in some cases actually like dog training, go completely unnoticed by the media. On chat shows if a man has cheated, he won't even be allowed to explain himself. YOU KNOW WHAT MISTER YOU DISGUST ME GET OFF MY SHOW and the audience will repeatedly boo and jeer him, even though he could well be innocent. If a woman has cheated, she more likely receives complete silence from the audience and the host's total sympathy as she cries her eyes out because she knows she should be in deep !@#$%. It's always the man's fault, and now we have one man who's done substantial research on the subject and simply giving his opinions and philosophy on the matter, the media instantly claws and scrapes at it.
Society needs to grow some !@#$% balls and accept it's not always the man's fault, and that if women really
are equal to men, they shouldn't be allowed to give some simple opinions on the opposite sex, or what they feel is advice (not commands, advice is not intended to be a universal thing either. You're supposed to read this and take from it what you feel might work for you), nevermind partake in radical feminism. "Freedom of speech", you retort. Well where is a man's freedom of speech then? "Err, umm, uhh, HE SHOULDN'T SAY NASTY THINGS LIKE THAT THOUGH BAWWW"
All I can say is people really need to learn how to think critically, and that if women actually do have rights, they shouldn't be held on such a god damn pedestal all the time with the media using those rights for them. If they really do have all these rights and are men's exact equals (and they clearly aren't exact equals) they should come out of their protective cocoons and face reality.
