I know it doesn't change the core gameplay, it just makes it "another FPS".
It's always been "another FPS". Counter-Strike is probably the most generic FPS you could find. It's just "Shoot to kill". That's it. Nothing more, nothing less. You buy a gun, shoot someone, or get shot. Everyone dies. Repeat.
It really seems like you're grasping for straws for your argument now. Same goes to all those other people complaining about the update with the same arguments you're using. You didn't even bother to check most of the points that you're arguing either.
Meh, don't like Counter Strike at all. Don't really understand what makes it so good, it looks shitty to begin with, then the gameplay physic are just... wow... can't really find any word to describe it. D:
What do you mean "gameplay physic (physics*)"? The gameplay is fine and easily adaptable since there isn't much to it in the first place.
You're making it off to be a completely horrible game, when infact, while being so generic, it's still better than 99% of the multiplayer FPS games out there. If there's one that tops it, it's Team Fortress 2. Halo is also up there (as much as I dislike Halo).